CHAPTER III
RESULTS:
I: It was illegal and invalid because it was against Article 128 of the Legitimate Constitution of 1857, the so-called “Salamanca Plan” and the replacement of the executive power that as interim president of the Republic made the President of the Supreme Court Mr. José María Iglesias, from October 26 to November 28, 1876, a fact that attempted against Article 82 of the Constitution of 1857, since if it were the case that Sebastian Lerdo de Tejada (president-elect) allegedly could not be ready to take charge on the date of December 1, that date had not yet arrived; In addition, in accordance with articles 5, 6 and 117 of the Fundamental Charter, the then president of the Supreme Court José María Iglesias, was not authorized to decide on political issues, nor could it qualify the legitimacy of the electoral resolution issued by the power nor to invade the sovereignty of the States, occupying the functions of the Executive Power, because with such flagrant violation of Article 16 of said law, it failed to understand the substantial difference between the judicial and the political, and was unduly authorized to explore the legality of the authorities, exceeding the content of articles 109 and 116 of the aforementioned document.
II: They were illegal and invalid for being against article 128 of the legitimate Constitution of 1857, the so-called “Plan de Tuxtepec” and “Plan de Palo Blanco” that reforms the “Plan de Tuxtepec”, issued by the military rebel coup General Don Porfirio Díaz, as well as the “Plan de la Noria”, for which President Benito Juárez is unknown and is overthrown with a coup d’état by the powers constituted and represented by the elected president Sebastián Lerdo de Tejada.
III: It was illegal and invalid for being against article 128 of the legitimate Constitution of 1857, the so-called “San Luis Plan” of the year 1910 by which Francisco Madero calls for a rebellion with the use of violence and weapons against General Porfirio Diaz, it was also illegal and invalidated the “Plan of the Citadel” for the murder of Madero and gestate a military rebellion, likewise illegal and invalidated the “Guadalupe Plan” by which another rebellion to overthrow to General Victoriano Huerta, the same luck of illegal and invalid was the “Plan of Agua Prieta”, to overthrow Venustiano Carranza, equally illegal and invalid was the “declaration dated October 10, 1913”, by which determines the dissolution of the Congress of the Union in force at that time.
In the same way they were contrary to the law and invalid for being against Article 128 of the Legitimate Constitution of 1857, the decree dated February 2, 1916, by which the Chief of the rebel forces Venustiano Carranza changed the residence of the federal powers to the theater Iturbide of the city of Querétaro, as well as “the Decree number 34 of date 27 of April of 1917” by which publishes and erects like constituted in electoral school to the spurious one, meeting of armed rebels that contrary to the article 9 They felt authorized to deliberate in the Iturbide theater of the city of Querétaro, which was nothing more than a misleading play of false meaning. In 1917 the alleged “constituent congress of 1917” was also illegal, held at the Iturbide theater in the city of Querétaro, as well as the faculties that the alleged congressmen said they had, since such powers could never legally fall on people who held a situation of rebellious insurgent delinquents, the same ones on whom fell the public accusation established in article 128 of the legitimate and still valid constitution of 1857.
It is clear that the alleged “initiative to reform the Constitution of 1857” was illegal, signed by revolutionary rebel Don Venustiano Carranza, presented on December 1, 1916; undue was the approval of the reform initiative of January 31, 1917, which aims to reform the legitimate and still valid Constitution of 1857; and the Transitory Decree of the so-called Constitution of 1917, by which it is said to take effect as of May 1 of that same year, is unfounded; it was also illegal the revolutionary decree of convocation dated September 19, 1916, issued by Carranza Chief of the revolutionary rebel forces, as well as the modifications to the Decree of December 12, 1914 given by the factionals in the city of Veracruz, which responds to the additions made to the “San Luis Plan” on March 26, 1913, of the sum of which is considered to have been issued on February 5, 1917, the spurious and false constitutional charter of 1917.